Now, these ads are good
16 Comments so far
Leave a comment
February 14, 2008, 10:12 am
Filed under: advertising, design, photos | Tags: FCB, FCB Johannesburg, lego, lego ads, lego advertising, South african ads, south african advertising
Filed under: advertising, design, photos | Tags: FCB, FCB Johannesburg, lego, lego ads, lego advertising, South african ads, south african advertising
Wish I’d done them, but they were actually by FCB Johannesburg.
Brilliant insight.
Brilliant ads.
Someone thought very hard indeed. They’d make great TV ads too.
16 Comments so far
Leave a comment
Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>










First impression of the top ad is that it’s a rather sinister juxtaposition of child’s toy and weapon of war. Ah well, probably just me.
Comment by Ken February 14, 2008 @ 10:19 pmnah. it’s what kids do, play vwith tanks planes and dinosaurs. you’ve been reading too much…
Comment by markgorman February 15, 2008 @ 7:39 amAgree these are really well done. Beautifully reduced to a nugget of pictorial goodness.
(see I got through that one without any tpyos!)
Comment by Matt McArthur February 17, 2008 @ 6:35 pmexcept for ‘typos’…
Comment by markgorman February 17, 2008 @ 9:22 pmas someone who spends a lot of time playing with lego with my five year old son…i think these are genius
Comment by kenneth February 18, 2008 @ 11:45 amactually…Ken’s right…these are not as genius as initial impact suggests
while the ads capture the real lego experience from a 5 year old boy’s perspective…5 year old boys are not the target audience.
the target audience is the middle class parent, many of whom have a pathological aversion to toy guns and militaristic paraphanalia…and who labour under the misconception that their boy-child will not develop an interest in this type of play.
of course, they are deluded…little boys create weaponry from whatever they can get their hands on…but that’s not the point.
beautifully executed though they are, these ads run the risk of reinforcing these middle class parental fears.
it’s unlikely to stop anyone buying lego, mind, cos it’s all totally brilliant. especially the strangely ‘acceptable’ weaponry presented by lego star wars…some of that stuff wipes out planets!
Comment by kenneth (revised) February 18, 2008 @ 1:22 pmThere’s only 1 weapon in the campaign.
Comment by markgorman February 18, 2008 @ 2:50 pmaye…but it’s not as well thunk-through as it at first appears.
Comment by kenneth (revised) February 18, 2008 @ 3:09 pmaye it is Mr “middle class parent.”
Comment by markgorman February 18, 2008 @ 4:12 pmnaw it’s not Mr ‘creative is everything’
anyway…doesn’t bother me, i’m a lego convert…i spent most of yesterday evening building a b-wing fighter. it’s got loads of guns and actually fires wee rockets.
Comment by kenneth (revised) February 18, 2008 @ 5:09 pmCreative is only everything when built on sound strategic foundations. You know that and you know I know that. Just cos there’s a pokey execution in an otherwise brilliant campaign (and that’s not me saying the pokey one isn’t brilliant) doesn’t mean that what you originally thought was great, isn’t.
Comment by markgorman February 18, 2008 @ 5:36 pmIt’s about the freedom of creativity. I’d prefer my child to build a nice house or car, but I’m not going to prevent him building castles and tanks.
As a middle-class parent these don’t bother me. I think the advertising is very clever. I doubt the tank will put of any but the most vehement liberal, guardian-reading, bush-hating, sandal-wearing, vegetarian. Otherwise it’s just a matter of:
“Tarquin, that’s a lovely tank, now why don’t you go and make something else.”
As usual a case of “We tolerate everything, except the things we don’t”.
Comment by Lincoln February 19, 2008 @ 12:31 pmBeautiful ads. Lovely thought. Well executed. But essentially designed by advertising people for advertising people. And for advertising awards juries. If – along the way – the ads help remind a few ‘Tarquins’ about the merit of toys that encourage their kids to be imaginative…well, even better. But let’s not get carried away. The world’s dissertation mountain is large enough.
Comment by Colin Montgomery February 19, 2008 @ 2:11 pm“except for ‘typos’…”
A wee gift
Lincoln is right, by the way – and I can’t imagine many parents really holding out against that weird kill-crazy phase most kids seem to go through. My parents are pretty liberal and have even been known to read the Guardian but they still armed me at a young age as being outside visiting death and destruction on the local wildlife seemed, on balance, preferable to playing Lotus Challenge on the Amiga.
Comment by matt mcarthur February 20, 2008 @ 3:17 pmI didn’t realise Monty was a Ad critic. Swing it just a little more inside big man. You’ll never win the Masters with a fade.
Comment by Guy Robertson March 7, 2008 @ 10:51 amand you’ll never win a masters.
There’s more than one Monty actually…
Comment by markgorman March 8, 2008 @ 8:02 am